The below is general information only. The information is not legal advice, and should not be treated as such and is subject to the legal disclaimer.
In some situations, you can contract away or limit someone’s right to pull your credit report.For example, in Scott v. Real Estate Fin. Grp., 183 F.3d 97, 100 (2d Cir. 1999) potential renters of a house conditioned “their offer to rent on the owner’s willingness to forego a credit check.” Id. at 100. The Scott Court held that “parties are free to contractually define whether or not a ‘legitimate business need’ exists ‘in connection with a business transaction.’” Id. Similarly in Uhlig v. Berge Ford, Inc., 257 F.Supp.2d 1228 (D.Ariz.2003), plaintiff purchased a vehicle from defendant with both a trade in and a personal check. During the sales transaction, defendant conducted a credit check despite plaintiff’s demand otherwise and she sought legal redress. In reliance on the Scott case, the district court explained that if parties can contractually agree to what a “legitimate business need” is, it could perceive no reason why they could not contractually agree as to whether any other purpose stated in section 1681b (a)(3) is permissible. Id. at 1233. But see Landeis v. Future Ford, 2:04-CV-2733-MCE-PAN, 2006 WL 1652659 (E.D. Cal. June 14, 2006) (expressly rejecting Uhlig).
In Young v. Harbor Mortor Works, Inc., 2:07CV0031JVB, 2009 WL 187793 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 27, 2009) a prospect car buyer specifically only allowed the car dealer to submit his credit application to Honda Financial and to no other lenders. The Young Court held that this stated a claim for violation of the FCRA.
So you may be able prevent someone from obtaining your credit report, who would have otherwise have a permissible purpose for obtaining your credit report. You also may be able to limit who can see your credit report. But it’s no sure thing. And you have to be proactive about preventing or limiting those who can access your credit report.
Another Article on Credit Reports and Jobs
/0 Comments/in Credit Reporting Issues, Featured /by Hays LawsonHere’s another article from ABC News about the importance of credit reports and job applications. The article’s focus is on knowledge and preparation.
Loans and Social Networking
/0 Comments/in Credit Reporting Issues, Featured /by Hays LawsonI admit that I seem to be falling behind the times. This story amazed me. Your social networking could affect your ability to get a loan. How long before consumer reporting agencies including a social Q rating as part of your credit report and score?
The article is titled:
Your Deadbeat Facebook Friends Could Cost You a Loan
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/09/lenders-vet-borrowers-social-media-facebook
Two Articles of Note Concerning Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
/0 Comments/in Debt Collector Abuse /by Hays LawsonFor those of you with issues with Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, here are two recent articles about PRA you might find interesting.
http://hamptonroads.com/2013/ 09/turnips-can-bleed- portfolio-recovery-story
Surprising things that Lower your Credit Score
/0 Comments/in Credit Reporting Issues /by Hays LawsonHere’s an interesting article about surprising things that can hurt your credit score. The article explains how the following can hurt your credit:
For those of you trying to improve your credit, the article is worth a read for things you shouldn’t do. I would add to the list applying for credit. To me it’s a bit counterintuitive that by applying for credit you actually hurt your ability to get credit. In other words, it’s so much easier to get credit you won’t you don’t need it.
Fake Debt Collectors on the Rise
/0 Comments/in Debt Collector Abuse, Featured /by Hays LawsonThe Better Business Bureau issued a recent press release alerting the public to an increase in fake-debt-collector activity.
While I have no statistics or research concerning fake debt collectors operating in Kentucky, I’ve recently been contacted by several people who’ve been contacted by what appears to be out and out scammers. So be cautious with any contact from a debt collector. The BBB press release lists these red flags to look out for:
Another red flag I’ve found is when there’s very little info about the debt collector on the web. If a Google search turns up few hits and no website for the debt collector, this could be an indication that you’ve been contacted by a fake debt collector.
Say no to Credit Pulls
/0 Comments/in Credit Reporting Issues /by Hays LawsonThe below is general information only. The information is not legal advice, and should not be treated as such and is subject to the legal disclaimer.
In some situations, you can contract away or limit someone’s right to pull your credit report.For example, in Scott v. Real Estate Fin. Grp., 183 F.3d 97, 100 (2d Cir. 1999) potential renters of a house conditioned “their offer to rent on the owner’s willingness to forego a credit check.” Id. at 100. The Scott Court held that “parties are free to contractually define whether or not a ‘legitimate business need’ exists ‘in connection with a business transaction.’” Id. Similarly in Uhlig v. Berge Ford, Inc., 257 F.Supp.2d 1228 (D.Ariz.2003), plaintiff purchased a vehicle from defendant with both a trade in and a personal check. During the sales transaction, defendant conducted a credit check despite plaintiff’s demand otherwise and she sought legal redress. In reliance on the Scott case, the district court explained that if parties can contractually agree to what a “legitimate business need” is, it could perceive no reason why they could not contractually agree as to whether any other purpose stated in section 1681b (a)(3) is permissible. Id. at 1233. But see Landeis v. Future Ford, 2:04-CV-2733-MCE-PAN, 2006 WL 1652659 (E.D. Cal. June 14, 2006) (expressly rejecting Uhlig).
In Young v. Harbor Mortor Works, Inc., 2:07CV0031JVB, 2009 WL 187793 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 27, 2009) a prospect car buyer specifically only allowed the car dealer to submit his credit application to Honda Financial and to no other lenders. The Young Court held that this stated a claim for violation of the FCRA.
So you may be able prevent someone from obtaining your credit report, who would have otherwise have a permissible purpose for obtaining your credit report. You also may be able to limit who can see your credit report. But it’s no sure thing. And you have to be proactive about preventing or limiting those who can access your credit report.
The FTC Shuts Down Phony Payday Loan Debt Collection Scam
/7 Comments/in Debt Collector Abuse /by Hays LawsonOn September 10, 2013, the FTC shut down a Florida scam that bilked millions out of consumers in a phony payday loan collection scam. According to the FTC
. . . .defendants Fisher, Andre Keith Sanders, Pro Credit Group, LLC, and Sanders Legal Group, P.A. set up U.S.-based financial accounts for a call center operation based in India to unfairly collect payday loan debts from consumers who either did not owe them, or owed them to somebody else. The operation’s callers used threats, lies, and abusive tactics to collect debts from consumers who had previously applied for or received loans from online payday loan companies and had supplied sensitive personal financial information that later found its way into the hands of those involved with the scam.
I’ve recently had clients getting debt collection calls/threats from an outfit allegedly out of Seattle Washington calling itself Mandatory Arbitration Services. From what I’ve been told, it appears that this debt collector is running a very similar scam on Kentucky residents.
Mandatory Arbitration Services does not appear to have registered to do business in Kentucky, Washington, or Delaware. I’ve not yet looked in any other states. If you are contacted by Mandatory Arbitration Services by very wary. And please give me a call ((502) 473-6525) and let me know.
A Car Dealer might use your Driver’s License to Pull your Credit Report
/0 Comments/in Credit Reporting Issues /by Hays LawsonThe below is general information only. The information is not legal advice, and should not be treated as such and is subject to the legal disclaimer.
According to a Consumer Report investigation, car dealers do not have to your social security number in order to pull your credit report. Rather, they can use your driver’s license to obtain a copy of your credit report. And if you’ve ever been shopping for a car at dealership, you know that dealers will get a copy of your license before letting you take a car for a test drive. The dealer may use the information on your license to pull a copy of your credit report. And the dealer might not ask for your permission to do so. This raises an interesting question of whether this violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Based on FTC opinion letter, this may well come to down to question of fact. According the FTC, “an automobile dealer may obtain a report only in those circumstances in which the consumer clearly understands that he or she is initiating the purchase or lease of a vehicle and the seller has a legitimate business need for the consumer report information in order to complete the transaction.” This opinion is based on the assumption that the car dealer is using 15 U.S.C. 1681b(3)(F)(1)[1] as its permissible purpose for pulling your credit report.
So if you don’t want a car dealer pulling your credit report when you take a test drive, you may want to expressly tell the dealer not to pull your report, just to protect yourself.
[1] “[A]ny consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report under the following circumstances and no other . . . [t]o a person which it has reason to believe . . . otherwise has a legitimate business need for the information–(i) in connection with a business transaction that is initiated by the consumer.”
Re-aging Debt
/0 Comments/in Credit Reporting Issues, Debt Collector Abuse /by Hays LawsonThe below is general information only. The information is not legal advice, and should not be treated as such and is subject to the legal disclaimer.
When it comes to your credit report, debts are not forever. Under the FCRA, debts are removed after a certain time period. The time period differs depending on the type of debt.
15 U.S.C. § 1681c.
“Re-aging” a debt is the practice of changing the beginning of time period from which the above time periods begin to run. This happens most frequently in connection with accounts placed for collection.
Debt collectors will sometimes flat out lie about the date on which the time period starts or deceptively report the opening of an account in such a way as to confuse the start date. Debt collectors may also coerce a small payment from a consumer and claim that this re-started the time running for elimination of the debt from the consumer’s credit report. Because the payment does not eliminate the delinquency, this does not restart the time running according the FTC. This type of debt re-aging violated the FCRA and FDCPA.
Parking Debts on Credit Reports
/0 Comments/in Debt Collector Abuse /by Hays LawsonJunk debt collectors sometimes will “park” a debt on your credit report. This means that the debt collector will report negative information about you to credit reporting agencies but take no other action to collect the debt. The collector then sits and waits for you to discover the negative information in connection with some important event in your life such as buying a home or applying for a job. At this point, your time for dealing with the debt will be short but the need to deal with it great. The debt collector can use the negative information and the time restraints as leverage to coerce payment from you, regardless of whether you actually owe the debt or the amount claimed. When a debt collector does this, it sometimes reports “new” account activity that re-ages the debt. Parking a debt most likely violates both the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.