In a rare win for Kentucky consumers, the Kentucky Supreme Court denied discretionary review in the case of Acuff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which could prove to be a very important foreclosure case.
The facts of Acuff are fairly simple. The bank, Wells Fargo, filed a foreclosure complaint against the Acuffs. Wells Fargo attached a copy of the note to its complaint. The note included an allonge that included an indorsement in blank that would have the affect of turning the note into bearer paper. The Acuffs defended on several grounds, the most important of which here is that Wells Fargo lacked standing to bring suit. In particular, the Acuffs alleged that allonge “lacked any identifiable information connecting it to their note, such as the date of transfer, ‘property address, loan number, parcel identification number, or borrower’s name;’” and that Wells Fargo had failed to produce the original note in prior requests under the Real Estate Procedures Act (“RESPA”).
The trial court granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo. The Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed on grounds that Wells Fargo failed to meet its burden of proving that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether it had standing to bring suit at the inception of the case:
We must conclude that the evidence in the record, as it currently stands and viewed in the light most favorable to the Acuffs, is insufficient to establish whether Wells Fargo was the holder of the Acuffs‘ original note and thus, the real party in interest at the time the foreclosure action was filed.